F7U Cutlass
F7U with Sparrow I AAMs |
First Flight: 1948,
September 29
Type: single-seat
carrier-based fighter
Power:
J46-WE-8A,
Westinghouse (2)
2767kg / 6100lb
afterburning thrust
Armament:
20mm
/ 0.78in cannon
Sparrow
AAMs (4) - underwing attachments
Size:
Wingspan
- 12.09m / 39ft 8in
38o
swept wing
Length
- 13.13m / 43ft 1in
Height
- 4.46m /
14ft 7.5in
Wing
Area - 46.08m2 / 496ft2
Weight:
Empty - 8260kg /
18,210lb
Max
Take-off - 14,353kg / 31,642lb
Performance:
Max
Speed - 1094kph / 680mph
Landing
Speed 220kph / 136mph
Ceiling
- 12,190m / 40,000ft
Range - 1062km / 660 miles
Climb - 3960m / 13,000fpm
Production: 290
F7U-3 built; introduced in 1951
Radical design featured no tail |
The world’s first operational fighter, the German Me 262, brought
an end to propeller-driven combat aviation for most air force planners. From here on out the future would be
jets. In 1945 the US Navy issued a
requirement that the next generation of carrier-borne fighters would be capable
of speeds of 600 mph. Chance-Vought won
the contract competition with a revolutionary new design. The F7U would be a tailless aircraft with twin
jet engines in its fuselage that would feature afterburners to give it
additional bursts of power. After a long
period of development, this aircraft would eventually equip 13 Navy and Marine
squadrons. Yet three years after
reaching the fleet in 1954, the F7U-3 Cutlass was withdrawn from service.
F7U pilots suffered many fatal accidents |
The aircraft was an ambitious design. It had gone beyond cutting-edge and strayed
into bleeding-edge technology. The
initial Westinghouse engines were disappointing, leaving the aircraft
underpowered. Its radical design enabled
it to achieve a tight turning radius but, overall, it was difficult to
fly. The F7U was overly complicated a
challenge to maintain. Engineers
eventually added more than 100 doors and access panels to its design. The twin engines took up most of the
available room in the fuselage, leaving little to spare for fuel. This resulted in a carrier plane with
insufficient range for ship-board operations.
This also meant that fuel-guzzling afterburners were of little use.
Extended nosewheel made landing difficult |
The tricycle landing gear, featuring a drastically extended nosewheel,
contributed to the danger in carrier landings.
The nose of the aircraft was redesigned repeatedly to improve pilot
visibility but the problem remained unsolved.
A 25% accident rate added considerably to pilots’ unhappiness with the Navy
jet. Once the safer, more reliable and
powerful F-8 Crusader became available to the fleet, the F7U was gratefully withdrawn. The aircraft was not a success but its
experience aided the research in developing future jets for the Navy, such as
the F-14 Tomcat.
Reconnaissance version of F7U |
No comments:
Post a Comment